News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules... by thephyber on Sunday March 12, 2023 @04:40PM (#35125978)
You’re missing the point. There’s no need to liquidate the bank or do a fire sale.

Assuming there was no malfeasance and the assets are as described on the books, the bank just needs liquidity so it doesn’t have to fire sale.

Also worth pointing out that every bank likely has the same problem trying to move treasuries from 1-5 years ago right now. The financial big heads should be trying to figure out how to make such a “safe investment” actually safe again.

Re:Yellen says government will help SVB depositors but rules... by ptero on Monday March 13, 2023 @09:32AM (#35135474)
The source of the problem is liquidity, not the problem assets. But providing this liquidity costs money. And, in my book, that money should not have been spent by government. Here is a simpler example:

A person deposits $1000 at a bank at 1% interest. Bank buys 10-year treasuries yielding 3%. Rates rise, treasuries drop and the person suddenly wants his $1000 back (say, because he can get 4% at an MMF with checkwriting privileges). Bank can sell those treasuries at $950 and eat the $50 loss. Or use own money. Or get a loan.

But this is not simply "the bank just needs liquidity". It sure does, but no one is willing to lend the bank money at a lower rate, so based on the original price and the current state (rates rose + the customer wants his money back) the bank will be short those $50 that went to the t-bond seller who can now buy the same bond back for $50 less.