News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta Rediscovers the Cubicle by d_sem on Sunday March 12, 2023 @12:05PM (#35121787)
Because one wants to have private in person communication. In my experience cubical and closed door office environments maximize communication and collaboration while open concept reduce it.

Closed doors are like therapist room - you get to the meaning of topics fast. They allow conflict resolution and discussion.

Open concept are like libraries, everyone is silently trying to to disturb each other working. Full of visual and audible distractions.

WFH remote meeting have the lowest form of communication bandwidth. It's hard to arbitrage interactions with no visual cues, invites multi-tasking during meetings, and encourages disengagement.

Re:Meta Rediscovers the Cubicle by coldtea on Sunday March 12, 2023 @12:44PM (#35122424)
>Because one wants to have private in person communication

So, like, if you Zoom'ed?

Re:Meta Rediscovers the Cubicle by mwest217 on Sunday March 12, 2023 @01:28PM (#35123136)
Zoom ≠ in person
Re:Meta Rediscovers the Cubicle by coldtea on Sunday March 12, 2023 @06:53PM (#35127557)
Well, it has everything "in person" has except physical precense.

Which, unless the meeting is about hanky panky or massage or something, should be just as good for the purposes of technical discussion...

Re:Meta Rediscovers the Cubicle by numpad0 on Monday March 13, 2023 @12:41AM (#35131163)
I think open concepts are more akin to cafeteria than libraries. Some people had done great gigs that always came from a table in their University cafeteria, and trying to industrialize that experience.