News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the... by mgraczyk on Saturday March 11, 2023 @04:18PM (#35112807)
I watched the video and in this case the "recovered" detail is clearly natural to me. The original case does look like some kind of moon-specific processing, but this one with clipped highlights seems natural and can be achieved using classical CV.
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the... by jitl on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:14PM (#35113789)
What? Clipped means gone - the pixel is FFFFFF - how can CV look at a FFFFFF pixel, surrounded by FFFFFF pixels, and get out a moon-looking pixel?
Re:Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the... by mgraczyk on Saturday March 11, 2023 @06:19PM (#35113833)
Because the nearby pixels are not clipped.