Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha...
by v8xi on Friday March 10, 2023 @11:20AM
(#35096429)
Except you forget that when democracy was first unveiled only white, land-owning males could vote because they supposed that they were educated and self-interested enough to make good decisions. The founding fathers were well-known to not trust the public for making decisions and thats WHY we (in the USA) have laws written up and argued over by the House and Senate and not popular vote...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha...
by freejazz on Friday March 10, 2023 @11:27AM
(#35096559)
Yeah, and democracy didn't just spontaneously appear - its the result of education and debates by educated people.
Re:Google dusts off the failed Google+ playbook to fight Cha...
by fwn on Friday March 10, 2023 @12:31PM
(#35097795)
Yes, I know that argument. So I'm curious: Would you support the initial restriction to only white, land-owning males as reasonable? Do you think, for example, that US women's suffrage required women to be educated first?
And, as you seem to assume, this skepticism led to more indirect forms of democratic institutions: Would you argue against direct democratic institutions in the U.S. on the same basis?