News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual ChatGPT by flakeoil on Friday March 10, 2023 @05:59AM (#35092910)
It's kind of similar to audio vs video. Although audio requires less data and processing than video, it's much more difficult to get the audio good than the video and if the audio is bad or even missing for some time, it's useless, while if the video is bad, stuck or missing, it's not that big of a deal most of the time.

This is particularly true in a video conferencing situation. If the audio is bad, you miss out a lot. If the video is bad, it's not a big deal.

Re:Visual ChatGPT by devenvdev on Friday March 10, 2023 @10:47AM (#35095881)
Deaf people would disagree :) if you talk in sign language on zoom missing video parts would ruin the conversation.

I don't think it's about precision, in the case of audio vs video - if you remove all the even columns from a video it would be similar to reducing quality, the same can be done with audio - removing half of the frequencies uniformly will just lower the quality.

Re:Visual ChatGPT by kelipso on Friday March 10, 2023 @11:35AM (#35096692)
That's a pretty specific case. You can get really good performance for a ton of tasks in video (video question answering, object identification and tracking, action recognition, etc) by just sampling a frame per second or even less frequently. Definitely can't do that with audio.