Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by jprete on Thursday March 09, 2023 @02:52PM
(#35085744)
The apple explanation is trivially wrong. The speed doesn’t depend on the mass of the apple to any reasonable approximation, while it does depend somewhat on air resistance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by throwuwu on Thursday March 09, 2023 @03:07PM
(#35085952)
That doesn’t sound right either, what’s the difference in acceleration for an apple in atmosphere vs an apple in vacuum over 4ft of drop?
Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by roflyear on Thursday March 09, 2023 @03:25PM
(#35086186)
air resistance.. ?
Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by throwuwu on Friday March 10, 2023 @11:32AM
(#35096642)
My question is what is the actual difference, an apple isn’t going to achieve a significantly higher velocity over 4ft without air resistance
Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by xdavidliu on Thursday March 09, 2023 @02:57PM
(#35085818)
does the air resistance depend on the mass?
Re:Noam Chomsky: The False Promise of ChatGPT
by dannymi on Thursday March 09, 2023 @03:39PM
(#35086351)
Drag force depends on the density of the air, the air's viscosity and compressibility, the velocity of the apple, the size and shape of the apple and the angle between the apple and the air flow.
Funny enough, since Newton's law is m z̈ = ∑ F, the actual velocity of the apple (ż) depends on the mass of the apple after all.
For the approximate force due to gravity, you have m g where g is the acceleration due to the Earth's gravity on objects close to the surface of the Earth.
In total, m z̈ = C ρ A ż^2/2 - m g where C is the drag coefficient, A is the reference area of the apple and ρ is the density of the (assumed spherical) apple.