There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically)

Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by chordalkeyboard on Thursday March 09, 2023 @11:23AM (#35082975)

D&G are a bad place to start with philosophy. I recommend watching these lectures by the late Professor Rick Roderick for a more accessible introduction: http://rickroderick.org/101-socrates-and-the-life-of-inquiry...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by soco on Thursday March 09, 2023 @11:40AM (#35083223)

Is D&G an established term for Deleuze&Guattari? Because for me it will always decode to Dolce&Gabbana...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by whitemary on Thursday March 09, 2023 @11:43AM (#35083259)

Yeah, it's slightly unfortunate but well-established inside and slightly outside of philosophy circles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by whitemary on Thursday March 09, 2023 @11:42AM (#35083250)

Rick Roderick is the best! Great recommendation!

[ Parent | on HN ]