No, that's not the misinterpretation that gp (ggambetta) was trying explain with the missing commas causing parsing confusion.
The "real programmer" isn't the main confusion. It's the missing commas.
The author was trying to convey (with some sarcasm) how some programmers have a sense of superiority when they can program in the abstraction layer underneath the programming language others are using. E.g. You code in Javascript?!? Meh, real programmers code in C. You code in C?!? Real programmers code in assembly. etc.
It's only after some readers get to the 4th sentence ("butterflies") that they backtrack to the previous sentences and realize they're missing commas. : It’s really an age old dilemma in computers: “real programmers” write code in C. No [,] “real programmers” write code in Assembly. No [,] “real programmers” write code in binary. No, wait, “real programmers” use butterflies.
Analogous to this XKCD joke about "purity" : https://xkcd.com/435/
The distraction of readers trying to parse the missing commas -- detracted from the author's intended rhetorical effect.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=real%20men
This is clear if we ask, 'what's the opposite of a real programmer?' - perhaps an imaginary programmer?