Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell
by Helmut10001 on Thursday March 09, 2023 @02:49AM
(#35079131)
It is not feasible in reality that requests to decrypt your personal data stored on-site through warrants. If my server is powered off, everything sits in several encrypted ZFS datasets. No one can prove that I am recording stuff at all. The camera could be there for deterrence only.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
That's not how the legal system works. The other party would claim that you are, the courts would believe them, and it'd be on you to deal with it. "It's not feasible" won't wash - especially if you don't spend tens of thousands on your defense.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell
by Helmut10001 on Thursday March 09, 2023 @09:27AM
(#35081482)
Well, of course it depends which legal system we are speaking, but where I live (Germany), there is a presumption of innocence until proof beyond a reasonable doubt establishes.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell
by asveikau on Thursday March 09, 2023 @02:23PM
(#35085441)
We theoretically have that in the United States, but occasionally the spirit or letter of that is not respected by authorities and juries.
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell
by asveikau on Thursday March 09, 2023 @02:23PM
(#35085431)
This.
I don't believe in cloud servers for home automation or home security stuff, I also think encryption and local storage is great, but all these techno-nerds are under delusions that enough geeking out on technical solutions will somehow change how law enforcement or the courts treat them. If they want to pursue you for something, it won't deter them.