News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The privacy loophole in your doorbell. Parent comment

Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by Johnny555 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @08:16PM (#35077155)
No, I'm saying that if I really owned the video, I could decide whether or not the police can use it. I'm not arguing whether or not the police should be able to have access to private video, but that you don't really own the video if you can't tell them "no" when they subpoena it.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by jamiek88 on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @09:19PM (#35077613)
Then you don’t actually own anything because I can think of a scenario where the government can take it.

including your freedom and your very life.

If the government does not have power to compel then property rights are moot anyway as the biggest warlord will just take your shit.

Seems a sophmoric definition of ‘own’.

Furthermore in this circumstance you aren’t even deprived of your video. They simply want a copy.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The privacy loophole in your doorbell by NegativeK on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @09:24PM (#35077651)
There is basically nothing physical in your life, excluding your body, that can't be subpoenaed.

This is not a reasonable definition of ownership.

[ Parent | on HN ]