News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Remote Code Execution as a Service by justinclift on Tuesday March 07, 2023 @07:15PM (#35063387)
> ... never had a breakout.

Would "never detected a breakout" be better wording? :)

Re:Remote Code Execution as a Service by ithkuil on Wednesday March 08, 2023 @03:37AM (#35066678)
> We had sophisticated network and system anomaly detection, high priced pentesters

I assume GP wrote that in order to say that they have a high confidence that they never actually had a breakout.

You are technically correct. But your logic applies to everything. Is the isolation provided by VMs good enough? Is airgapping enough to prevent breakout?

There are many things that factor in when you decide what's reasonable. Some are first principle arguments (containers use the same kernel as the host, the kernel has a large surface area, ...). Others are statistical arguments: there have been past breakouts with this stack, it's thus reasonable to expect more in the future, ...