Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by triceratops on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:39PM
(#35045542)
If you combine that with looser zoning regs, the higher rents will make building more housing more lucrative.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by bmitc on Monday March 06, 2023 @02:08PM
(#35046036)
In my mind, I was separating out homes for rent from investment and second/third/so-on homes. Although, it seems tough to separate those out since investment homes and non-primary homes are often rented out, although sometimes not permanently or continuously as homes specifically treated as rental properties. It needs some more thought, but I don't like the no holds barred approach that takes place right now. I in general don't like homes being treated as a business and investments, and I think it should be discouraged. Apartment complexes are a little different. Even there though, renters need better protection. One of my friend's rent just increased by 25%. It's ridiculous.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by cwkoss on Monday March 06, 2023 @03:12PM
(#35046918)
Make the tax scale with number of homes the entity owns.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi...
by choward on Monday March 06, 2023 @03:41PM
(#35047277)
They might not be able to find someone to pay that rent. In which case they might be forced to sell. Ideally someone who doesn't own a home will purchase it and won't have to pay the tax that caused the original owner to sell.
In those high-demand areas, owners will simply pass those tax costs down to their tenants, and the rents prices will go up, leading to even less affordability.