News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by jdxcode on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:37PM (#35036885)
I've never understood why HN has never included even a 80 character description. I think it would really help even if it was only shown on the comments tab.
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by n2d4 on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:49PM (#35036967)
One reason I could think of is because it encourages informative titles - I enjoy being able to click directly from home page to article, without having to look at the comments. A lower percentage of posters would explain Ruff in the title if there was a description. (Clearly it's currently not 100% either, that's why I'm here.)

Though this is something that keeps coming up on Reddit as well, I assume there's a reason why HN went with this design.

Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by camtarn on Monday March 06, 2023 @08:14AM (#35040545)
This conflicts with the HN guideline of not editorialising titles, which leads to titles often having little or zero context.
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by oefrha on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:00AM (#35037949)
It’s clearly explained in the FAQ:

> How do I make a link in a text submission?

> You can't. This is to prevent people from submitting a link with their comments in a privileged position at the top of the page. If you want to submit a link with comments, just submit it, then add a regular comment.

If you want to add more context, add it in a comment. If it’s good people will upvote it.