News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff. Parent comment

Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by furyofantares on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:20PM (#35036760)
How many orders of magnitude?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by qbasic_forever on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:23PM (#35036782)
There's a very clear graph the first thing on ruff's GitHub page, easy to find and research yourself: https://github.com/charliermarsh/ruff Can't miss it if you take time to check out the project.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by furyofantares on Sunday March 05, 2023 @09:24PM (#35036793)
So 2, maybe 3
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by p5a0u9l on Sunday March 05, 2023 @10:46PM (#35037312)
Your comment seems skeptical. Practically, It’s a night and day difference if you’ve integrated a linter with your editor. Plus, ruff is able to fix as well as lint.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Even the Pylint codebase uses Ruff by furyofantares on Sunday March 05, 2023 @11:43PM (#35037593)
Didn't mean it that way, something being 100+ times slower is a LOT. And I care a lot about tool speed. I just didn't really think I needed to be shamed for asking a question they had a ready answer for.
[ Parent | on HN ]