News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by kwhitefoot on Sunday March 05, 2023 @02:43PM (#35033160)
> legacy preferences

Why does this even exist?

Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by pjscott on Sunday March 05, 2023 @03:01PM (#35033355)
There's a market for getting underqualified students into fancy universities via legalized semi-bribery, but it would be bad for their image if they openly admitted to it. Hence the obfuscation.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by wheelinsupial on Sunday March 05, 2023 @04:18PM (#35034033)
"In the United States, legacy admissions in universities date back to the 1920s. Elite schools used legacy admissions to maintain spots for Anglo-Protestants amid fears that Jews, Catholics, and Asians were increasingly taking spots at the schools.[7][8]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legacy_preferences

Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by twiddling on Sunday March 05, 2023 @07:22PM (#35035869)
How do you think some of those fancy new wings/building get their names?
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by kwhitefoot on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:31PM (#35045407)
Where I come from some are named for illustrious alumni, some of whom financed the building. But as far as I know it didn't give their offspring an easier way to get accepted as students.