News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by Ekaros on Sunday March 05, 2023 @02:38PM (#35033120)
Maybe a test is bad if you can study all of the material or enough of it in 20 hours.

Realistically good test would require that multi-hundred hour build up.

Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by Jensson on Sunday March 05, 2023 @03:05PM (#35033406)
SAT stands for aptitude test, why would an aptitude test require multi-hundred hours of studying? All you need is to know a bit of math and how to read and you can score really well, you'd think that would be a shit test but apparently 90% of people can neither read well nor do a bit of math, so it is actually a good test.
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by hgsgm on Sunday March 05, 2023 @10:56PM (#35037360)
The SAT stopped being called an Aptitude test in 1994, when they decided it didn't mean anything except "correlated to score on other SAT sessions, and to college GPA"
Re:Dropping the Sat Requirement Is a Luxury Belief by seanmcdirmid on Sunday March 05, 2023 @03:57PM (#35033854)
The SAT and ACT are pretty easy in this regard. You can do really good at it just by practicing for a few months. Nothing like the Chinese Gaokao, which you need to study for a couple of years at least.