Re:Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optic...
by somewhereoutth on Saturday March 04, 2023 @05:59AM
(#35019982)
Apple is basically Bauhaus for nerd stuff - and that is no small thing. Perhaps if the microcomputer had been first commercialised in Europe they'd all look like that anyway.
Re:Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optic...
by chaostheory on Saturday March 04, 2023 @09:48AM
(#35021090)
Personally, I view Apple more as a fashion house that sells tech.
Re:Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optic...
by nfgrep on Saturday March 04, 2023 @02:45PM
(#35023843)
Those fashion designers make a pretty mean little RISC chip.
Re:Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optic...
by IIAOPSW on Saturday March 04, 2023 @06:38AM
(#35020112)
If instead of "very easy" would you be happy if I said minimalism is the "least hard" to pull off?
Re:Could we make the web more immersive using a simple optic...
by sings on Saturday March 04, 2023 @07:08AM
(#35020261)
Cue Kevin McCloud from Grand Design whose standard rant about minimalism is that it’s actually the hardest to pull off because you aren’t hiding behind anything. All of your decisions are exposed, so you have to be even more thoughtful about attaining cohesion in the final form. Of course, he is talking about buildings which is a different thing, but I think some of what he says applies to other design fields too, including UI design.
Fundamentally, what makes design pleasing is super hard to reason about.
If it was mostly about repetition and consistency, any webpage that used bootstrap or no css at all would be pleasing. If pleasing minimalism was very easy to pull off, nobody would take note of Apple products.