Re:Supreme Court rules 9-0 that warrant absolutely needed fo...
by wtn on Monday January 23, 2012 @03:16PM
(#3501946)
He was asking for examples where lower courts ignored McDonald v. Chicago.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules 9-0 that warrant absolutely needed fo...
by iamdave on Monday January 23, 2012 @04:22PM
(#3502182)
In Ezell v. Chicago, decided July 6, 2011, the Seventh Circuit reversed a district court decision that the post-McDonald measures adopted by the City of Chicago were constitutional.
It's in the wiki entry. Under related cases. As I previously stated.