News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by peoplearepeople on Friday March 03, 2023 @07:02PM (#35016653)
> Want to use FUSE?

Fuse is infuriating on MacOS - why is it not included by default??

Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by coldtea on Friday March 03, 2023 @09:23PM (#35017504)
Because it's a random third party filesystem adaptor module.

Why would it be "included by default"?

Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by AnthonyMouse on Saturday March 04, 2023 @02:32AM (#35019013)
Most of the Unix utilities that are included were written by third parties. They're "included by default" because they're useful and take up a negligible amount of space.
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by coldtea on Saturday March 04, 2023 @11:24AM (#35021982)
They're included by default because they are standard UNIX userland.

FUSE is nowhere near that.

Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by AnthonyMouse on Saturday March 04, 2023 @02:13PM (#35023564)
FUSE is newer than netcat or bzip2. That doesn't mean it isn't expected as standard. Linux, BSD and others all have it.
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by mtrower on Friday March 10, 2023 @11:11PM (#35105227)
Where is FUSE in the POSIX or SUS standard?
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by peoplearepeople on Monday March 06, 2023 @03:15PM (#35046952)
A machine without FUSE is a toy
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by peoplearepeople on Monday March 06, 2023 @03:14PM (#35046941)
Because it's necessary for a load of use-cases, and installing a *kernel* extension for it is terrible for deployment
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by octotoad on Saturday March 04, 2023 @03:56AM (#35019375)
MacFUSE isn’t even open source anymore, so it would likely involve Apple forking a version prior to the license change and maintaining that themselves.
Re:ARM64 Linux Workstation by fidgewidge on Saturday March 04, 2023 @05:11AM (#35019731)
They have their own APIs for it but seem to have assessed that the only mainstream use case is cloud sync, which they always provide a better API for.