News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The moral case against equity language by parineum on Friday March 03, 2023 @03:50AM (#35007280)
The answer is for people to make their preferences known and not hold it against people what is not done with malice.

It's pretty simple.

Re:The moral case against equity language by faeriechangling on Sunday March 05, 2023 @02:27AM (#35027620)
Pretty simple if you don’t have to deal with the logistics of this. How can you judge if something was done with malice or not in the first place especially when we’re talking about disabilities which impair being able to read between the lines fairly often? People can make their preferences clear but how does one meet the preferences of many people in a mass communication?
Re:The moral case against equity language by tmn on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:09PM (#35043549)
Benefit of the doubt? Why is it important to know for sure if something so benign is done with malice or ignorance on an initial take. Just assume ignorance and if it continues it becomes clear that it's malice.