There’s a cute story I read the other day about an “Offensiveness consultant” who teaches companies how to be just offensive enough on Twitter to make sure woke people don’t want to work at your company. The story is written for comedy - but the more I think about it, the more I wonder might be something people actively do, for all the reasons you’re talking about.
https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/even-more-bay-area-hou...
Re:The moral case against equity language
by LooseMarmoset on Friday March 03, 2023 @08:40AM
(#35009460)
That story is really great - I can honestly imagine a Silicon Valley startup party going exactly like the story describes.
Re:The moral case against equity language
by fidgewidge on Friday March 03, 2023 @08:48AM
(#35009571)
You don't even have to be offensive. Just give an all hands where the leadership publicly commits to merit-based promotion/hiring, tell people the org is now "mission focussed", stick a few rugs around the place that say "Meritocracy" on them and then get rid of anyone who complains. No offense will be taken by anyone who you don't want to be offended.
Re:The moral case against equity language
by circlefavshape on Friday March 03, 2023 @04:45AM
(#35007623)
Policing language and beliefs is a lot older than communism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition
Re:The moral case against equity language
by fidgewidge on Friday March 03, 2023 @08:46AM
(#35009546)
Beliefs, yes. But which part of the Inquisition was specifically about banning long lists of specific words, replacing them with semantically identical equivalents? Perhaps they did it, my history isn't that good, but the wiki page doesn't seem to discuss it much if so.
Re:The moral case against equity language
by circlefavshape on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:49PM
(#35044579)
The Reformation replaced the Latin mass with something pretty much equivalent, but in a different language
Now a lot of readers will feel like that's absurd, extreme, maybe even trolling. But it was only a handful of years ago that I was posting here warning people that they should refuse to rename git master branches to main because accepting this for short term convenience or out of ideological sympathy would lead to an endless spiral of power games, used to purge anyone not on the far left. And here we are, not so long after, with lists of banned words so long nobody even bothers enumerating them all, any one of which can be used to build a case for getting rid of you.
There's a clear pattern here in which people are repeatedly not taking wokeness seriously enough. This isn't a game and they spend every waking hour taking over every institution. A communist revolution doesn't require capturing the seat of government permanently, if you can capture every institution that surrounds it and essentially eliminate all ability for a non revolutionary government to operate.
The fix is simple enough though: do a DHH and get rid of all woke people in your organisation. It's quite easy as given a hostile environment they tend to leave en masse and they weren't doing much work for the organisation anyway. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.