Re:The moral case against equity language
by nonethewiser on Thursday March 02, 2023 @11:19PM
(#35005767)
> As such, it never stops at a reasonable, meaningful equilibrium; it has to be kept pacing, moving for
In fact, proponents can’t even define this equilibrium, despite stating that it is the end goal. This proves that the goal is a lie.
It’s pure power seeking, and that shouldn’t be a surprise, because that is precisely what they assert determines truth and shapew society. Not some natural order, but people who held power over others. They complain about it but if you watch, it’s exactly what they’re doing themselves. Pure projection.
In fact, proponents can’t even define this equilibrium, despite stating that it is the end goal. This proves that the goal is a lie.
It’s pure power seeking, and that shouldn’t be a surprise, because that is precisely what they assert determines truth and shapew society. Not some natural order, but people who held power over others. They complain about it but if you watch, it’s exactly what they’re doing themselves. Pure projection.