Re:Chicago sold rights to 36k parking meters for $1.2B that ...
by analyst74 on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:57PM
(#34990093)
Why would Chinese owners want to buy that? It seems unlikely that Australia will hold its bargain for the whole 200 years given current political climate.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Chicago sold rights to 36k parking meters for $1.2B that ...
by selcuka on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @07:07PM
(#34990175)
They bought it for $3.5B, but the annual revenue of SA Power Networks is around $600M. I don't know the profit margin, but they won't have to wait for 200 years to get their investment back.
Re:Chicago sold rights to 36k parking meters for $1.2B that ...
by analyst74 on Thursday March 02, 2023 @12:16PM
(#34998591)
Typical utility company margin is ~10%, so $60M profit for the buyer, it will take 58.3 years before they break even, or 1.7% return on their capital.
This just seems like a really bad deal for whoever buys it.
Re:Chicago sold rights to 36k parking meters for $1.2B that ...
by selcuka on Thursday March 02, 2023 @08:22PM
(#35004579)
Obviously this is assuming that the energy prices will be stable in the next decades. The AER decided that SA Power Networks can have a total of $3914.2 million from its customers from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2025, which is already higher than the $600M/year figure above.
Regarding your 10% assumption: In June 2014, the Adelaide Advertiser reported that SA Power Networks made after-tax profits of $420 a year from each customer compared with $92 for another Li Ka-shing-owned utility in Britain. I don't believe the average customer paid $4,200 for energy in 2014, so their profit margin must be much higher than 10%.