Most of these was either included with something or bought for about $5/piece. Nothing bad ever happened. Really it feels like some people got scared half of the decade ago and haven't checked since.
In terms of hassle, USB-C is a bit of a step backwards from the prior USB versions.
With USB-C you can just buy a superset cable, that supports everything at max speeds/max amperage and that's it.
> And many micro/mini connectors are just unreliable crap.
I suppose, although the only connectors I've had fail on me have been USB-C connectors.
> With USB-C you can just buy a superset cable
Serious question: how do I identify them? What do I search for?
Thank you! I'll keep this in mind for when I can't avoid USB-C any longer. The day is coming. I already have three devices that only have USB-C.
Appart from that, all cables support 3 amperes. So unless you want more for some reason, USB 2.0 vs 3.x is all you need to care about. Only USB 3.0 cables will work for all use cases.
5A cables are less physically flexible, but more efficient regardless of whether the devices need 5A or not. 3A/5A distinction just affects energy transfer efficiency.
So there are only two axes of parameters to decide about, and only one affects functionality and only USB 2.0 cable option will be functionally limiting.
Similar concerns apply if you want Type-C legacy cable (with non-type-C connector on one side). But that's straying away from the type-c only world, anyway.
I know that eventually I'll have no choice but to go all USB-C, but for now, I can keep delaying that. By the time I do adopt it, perhaps they'll have figured out how to fix this issue and I'll be happy.