You might want to take a look at biking again. Most people think "oh no, I live in a suburb it will be impossible", but once you really give it a shot you might be surprised at how many places you can reach on a bike.

A 5 mile bike commute sounds like it will be impossible, but it only took me about a month to acclimate to it and I'm hardy a fitness nut. Now I only drive when the weather is particularly nasty or there is too much ice on the ground. Also, the selection of affordable e-Bikes has absolutely exploded over the past couple of years and they can seriously open up opportunities if you're willing to try. Just because people say that American suburbs require a car doesn't make it true.

I agree people don't realise how easy and useful a bike can be for them.

People's main regret is not trying it sooner!

And versatile. From getting your groceries to exploring those places you'd never been before. Not even speaking about the benefits for your health.

Here in Latin America we somehow imported the car-centric culture from the USA but slowly people has been realizing it just don't fit too well our own complexities. Things like the Ciclovía[1] here in Bogotá came to be in part of that - people didn't liked how we surrended that much space for cars, and people wanted to do some workout. Why can't we take some of that space for that, at least temporarily?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ciclovía

5 miles (8km) on regular bike is quite far also depending on terrain and traffic, but I was riding bike to work 4km in Beijing traffic (!) and I could do it in 15-20 minutes (faster than bus doing detours, no subway between these two locations and obviously no trams there), although to this day I am still amazed I never had accident considering the traffic, cars driving wrong direction in MY separated bike lane, etc.

It seems like that for the first month or so, but once your legs acclimate it's really not a problem. Only takes like 30 minutes even at a stately pace. The biggest delay is waiting for the traffic signals that can't see you because you aren't a 2 ton hunk of steel.

I mean the distance ain't exhausting, but in real life conditions it will take minimum 30 (that's quite aggressive biking and lucky with traffic) and more like 40 minutes ride one way which is just too much on bike in traffic, that's already too long time. All my times are for normal bike, not ebike, if you go for ebike might as well go for small motorbike, it will be cheaper, faster and more convenient to use.

Did you go to any of the rural areas around Amsterdam? It's insane how connected they are to Centraal, you can take a bus for 20 minutes and be out in idyllic countryside north of Amsterdam

Totally agreed. I went to Copenhagen last summer and it was _really nice_.

The real question is how you would like to live in one of the rowhouses there, compared to what you can get in America.

Having lived in both SF / NYC and Amsterdam, the Dutch flats have a much higher standard for everything, lighting / heat / appliances. Good luck finding a place in NYC that's not a renovation nightmare hiding under a thin coat of paint

NYC is a poor comparison since it too is a quite walkable city. A better comparison might be Cleveland or Chicago, which are much more Americanly unwalkable commuter cities

Chicago is consistently ranked one of the most walkable cities in the country; New York is more walkable, but Chicago isn't "unwalkable".

Point taken, let’s just mock Cleveland then :D

I've never been in Cleveland at less than 70MPH, so, sure. But if someone who knows Cleveland really well shoots this down, I'm going to be on their side. :)

I, for one, would very much so like to live in a row house, but they're nigh illegal to construct in my city.

The closest you'll get to that European-style city in the US is Boston. It's very walkable, high density public transport, and quite a bit of charm in my opinion. Also cars are clearly an after-thought in Boston proper.

I would have thought New York City would also qualify.

NYC definitely has urban density and good public transport, but it's much bigger than Boston, and more car-friendly than Boston.

> I love my car and the open road, but I think I might prefer walkable cities…

The more people that have walking, cycling, and transit as an option, the fewer people may drive, reducing congestion for the folks that have no choice to drive (e.g., deliveries, service techs, etc), or those that may need/want to drive only occasionally.

Not Just Bikes (of course) had a video "The Best Country in the World for Drivers":

> The Netherlands is famous for bicycles, and putting walking, cycling, and public transit ahead of cars. Yet paradoxically, it's the best place in the world to be a driver.

* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8RRE2rDw4k

Further, by having higher density (and not even the Manhattan-levels that some folks think when they hear "urban"), you need less land, which means you don't have to pave over rural areas as much and you get more actual nature.

I think a huge barrier to walkable cities in America is you have to travel to Europe to even see one. No one can even visit to see what it is like without a lot of money and effort. Once we have even one decent, walkable city we will probably see an explosion of people saying "I want THAT!"

I too love driving and look forward to car free cities. Driving in cities sucks anyways.