News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by elliotec on Monday February 27, 2023 @12:40PM (#34959442)
What do you think is the good reason?
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by ajkjk on Monday February 27, 2023 @02:35PM (#34960861)
because writing HTML manually is fucking terrible compared to authoring markdown. We (i.e. everybody) are trying to improve things because they are bad.
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by elliotec on Monday February 27, 2023 @08:00PM (#34964356)
I mean, I agree that incremental improvements are great but also I think your hyperbole is a bit of an overreaction. I use markdown and templates and Software people rightly prefer reuse and DRY principles but handwriting html is honestly only barely a notch more primitive.
Re:Minimum Viable Hugo – No CSS, no JavaScript, 1 static HTM... by marcosdumay on Monday February 27, 2023 @03:06PM (#34961202)
HTML files can't reuse anything, HTML is a pretty bad verbose language, it is hard to keep indexes and links up to date when you change your site, and well, a lot of other reasons that I didn't think about because I gave-up on that in the 90's.