News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two things about SOPA/PIPA and then I'll shut up by snowwrestler on Saturday January 21, 2012 @08:43PM (#3495319)
Consider how long it takes to make a movie sometimes. The Tolkien estate realized quite a bit of value on the Lord of the Rings copyright via the Peter Jackson films, several decades after it had been written (not sure of the exact timing of the various payments).

Now--is that a good argument for such a long copyright period? I don't think so. I think the only time copyright should survive the author's death is if they have kids who are not yet adult.

Re:Two things about SOPA/PIPA and then I'll shut up by modeless on Saturday January 21, 2012 @09:03PM (#3495365)
We can all think of many works that continue to be popular decades after their creation, but that's precisely because we only remember the popular ones. These are by far the exception to the rule, and we shouldn't tailor our copyright policies for them.

The intention of copyright is to promote the creation of works. Rewarding authors is the means, not the end. In the case of LOTR, Tolkien didn't write it to provide licensing revenue to his grandchildren; he wrote LOTR because the creation of fantasy languages and histories was his passion and he could make some money from it. A much shorter copyright would have sufficed to inspire the creation of LOTR. Furthermore, the creation of movie adaptations would be helped by LOTR coming out of copyright, not hindered. Disney's empire was built on adaptations of out-of-copyright stories. Shorter copyright would in many ways encourage the creation of more works.

Re:Two things about SOPA/PIPA and then I'll shut up by snowwrestler on Saturday January 21, 2012 @09:21PM (#3495400)
In case it wasn't clear above, I totally agree with you. If we could ever get copyright shortened I would expect a surge of creative output.
Re:Two things about SOPA/PIPA and then I'll shut up by snprbob86 on Saturday January 21, 2012 @08:49PM (#3495334)
Isn't the LotR universe protected by trademarks? I'd imagine the books and movies are protected by legally distinct copyrights.

Trademarks clearly should have much longer protection periods than copyright. In fact, a business should be able to operate infinitely under the same legally protected name as long as they remain an active business in good standing and the haven't lost their brand name to a word in common usage.