Re:WebM-Enabled Browser Usage Share Exceeds H.264-Enabled ones
by unicornporn on Saturday January 21, 2012 @05:37PM
(#3494887)
Sorry for nitpicking, but I don't think we should compare a container format (WebM) with a video compression format (H.264 or VP8). A container format isn't very likely to have hardware acceleration.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:WebM-Enabled Browser Usage Share Exceeds H.264-Enabled ones
by asomiv on Saturday January 21, 2012 @06:35PM
(#3495034)
WebM isn't a container format. It's a standard which specifies MKV (container) + VP8 (video codec) + Vorbis (audio codec).
Re:WebM-Enabled Browser Usage Share Exceeds H.264-Enabled ones
by jensnockert on Saturday January 21, 2012 @06:10PM
(#3494976)
WebM always contains VP8 video though, otherwise it is a Matroska file.