News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than ChatGPT within 10 years. Parent comment

Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by KeplerBoy on Saturday February 25, 2023 @03:12PM (#34939982)
quintillion bytes of social media probably have very limited value.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by motoxpro on Saturday February 25, 2023 @03:16PM (#34940009)
Really? All of humanity imparting everything they think and know publicly seems incredibly valuable. 100% serious.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by BooneJS on Saturday February 25, 2023 @03:49PM (#34940314)
If you're looking to make a tweet generator, sure. If you're looking to harness the power of facts, no.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by rvnx on Saturday February 25, 2023 @07:27PM (#34941886)
The main issue might be that the training set may get polluted by a lot of AI generated text (content that is not supposed to be there, but is there because AI-generated content is becoming widespread online).
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by zamnos on Saturday February 25, 2023 @10:45PM (#34942848)
Storage is cheap. With ChatGPT being the preminent system, and with OpenAI recording all of its output, it should be possible to exclude modified answers from the training data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by motoxpro on Saturday February 25, 2023 @09:48PM (#34942568)
So interesting that people think facts are the only thing that's valuable. Your comment isn't a fact, does that mean it's worthless?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Nvidia predicts AI models 1,000,000X more powerful than C... by ranguna on Sunday February 26, 2023 @03:32AM (#34944013)
When looked at individually it's not worthless, but when you are talking about a corpus that significantly lacks facts, then the corpus itself is worthless for any mainstream usage other than a social network text generator.
[ Parent | on HN ]