News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by naasking on Friday February 24, 2023 @01:55PM (#34928368)
Facebook maybe can't make money from it, but they arguably could save money from it, for instance in automating some fact checking and moderation activities that they currently spend quite a bit of money on.
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by sclarisse on Friday February 24, 2023 @10:39PM (#34933620)
If you’re going to ask an AI to do fact checking with today’s technology, I would urge you to start by asking the AI a simple test question: Which is heavier? A pound of feathers or two pounds of lead?
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by elbear on Saturday February 25, 2023 @02:21AM (#34934645)
Do you have an explanation for why it fails on this question?
Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by panarky on Saturday February 25, 2023 @03:26AM (#34934930)
Why assume it fails?

ChatGPT: "One pound of feathers and two pounds of lead weigh the same, which is one pound or 16 ounces. The difference is in their volume, where a pound of feathers takes up more space than two pounds of lead. This is because the density of feathers is much less than that of lead, so even though the weight is the same, the amount of space they occupy is quite different."

Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by espadrine on Saturday February 25, 2023 @05:04AM (#34935428)
Your question makes it sound like you believe it succeeds, but the answer you pasted is incorrect.

As for why it fails, it is likely a bias arising from the question being way more commonly asked in the corpus with equal mass than with distinct mass, increasing attention weights towards an answer expressing equality.

I believe current LLMs lack some common sense at an architectural level. They learn both specialized facts and general deduction in the same weights class: in my mind, they should separate their world model from their instance model.

Re:LLaMA: A foundational, 65B-parameter large language model by selfhoster11 on Saturday February 25, 2023 @07:55AM (#34936299)
I was going to provide evidence that this works correctly, but I was surprised to find that it gets severely tripped up on this particular question, even when told to “show working step by step”.