News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by joeltt on Friday February 24, 2023 @10:36AM (#34925520)
Just like driving cars were "just around the corner", I highly doubt 1-2 years will fix the issues, that "last x%" is exponentially more difficult.
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by snek_case on Friday February 24, 2023 @11:18AM (#34926114)
I don't think it's necessarily as hard as you think. Can't do math? Teach the model to use an external mathematical expression evaluator to do math. Makes up inaccurate information? Teach it to query an external knowledge base. How hard to implement do you think that is? They're already working on it.
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by pwinnski on Friday February 24, 2023 @12:13PM (#34926869)
> How hard to implement do you think that is?

Very, very, very, very hard.

Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by williamcotton on Friday February 24, 2023 @12:17PM (#34926935)
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by mijail on Friday February 24, 2023 @03:47PM (#34929906)
@williamcotton - saw this the other day in the prompt engineering post - I enjoyed it. Sent you a message on your site but something looks broken. If you use linkedin I requested to connect.
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by williamcotton on Friday February 24, 2023 @05:03PM (#34930757)
Doh, I’ll look into that contact form! I’ll check my LinkedIn now. I’m glad you found it interesting!
Re:AI chatbots are having their “tulip mania” moment by BobbyJo on Friday February 24, 2023 @11:22AM (#34926172)
I think there is a greater tolerance for error here though.

Cars haven't made it yet because the assumption about allowable errors was wrong. Turns out it isn't "good enough" for self-driving cars to be safer than humans.