Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday February 24, 2023 @07:39AM
(#34923864)
You are thinking of Snap probably. Some flatpaks have $HOME wide-open, but Flatpak itself has no mechanism to completely bypass the sandboxing, as evidenced by things like Wireshark being unable to actually capture packets and many IDEs being unable to actually call build tools.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by yencabulator on Friday February 24, 2023 @12:15PM
(#34926913)
> Some flatpaks have $HOME wide-open, but Flatpak itself has no mechanism to completely bypass the sandboxing
The first one is the second one.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday February 24, 2023 @12:57PM
(#34927495)
We're obviously using extremely different definitions of the word "completely". Flatpak sandboxes more than just file system access.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by yencabulator on Friday February 24, 2023 @01:12PM
(#34927724)
And write access to $HOME lets a process climb out of the sandbox.
Trying to make sense of Flatpak's threat model is just near-impossible. It might protect you from something, if the specific app's configuration told it to do so. Starting a random Flatpak app, you have no guarantees, and the UX doesn't communicate anything about this.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by AnIdiotOnTheNet on Friday February 24, 2023 @02:46PM
(#34929106)
I totally agree about letting applications determine their own defaults being a bad idea.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by Gigachad on Friday February 24, 2023 @04:52PM
(#34930632)
We are in a transition period. Starting with getting apps packaged in flatpak even if it doesn’t improve security, and then once that’s all done we can start tightening the restrictions.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by yencabulator on Friday February 24, 2023 @05:09PM
(#34930839)
We shall see. "And then, we add security" has so far never won.
Re:KDE and GNOME seeks $100k to turn Flathub into a Store fo...
by littlestymaar on Saturday February 25, 2023 @04:13PM
(#34940541)
In that case can you please at least stop advertising flatpak for its security until it happen to be secure eventually…