Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by satvikpendem on Thursday February 23, 2023 @05:41PM
(#34917736)
Problem is that's not how academic funding works. Grants are generally not given to possible dead ends.
Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by ModernMech on Thursday February 23, 2023 @06:22PM
(#34918249)
Research grants are typically given with the expectation the project may possibly be a dead end. Otherwise it wouldn’t be research.
Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by satvikpendem on Thursday February 23, 2023 @06:25PM
(#34918287)
In theory, yes; in practice, no. Many grants these days are given based on the trend du jour.
Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by ModernMech on Thursday February 23, 2023 @07:00PM
(#34918665)
Sure, but funding trends is different from funding things expected to work.
Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by quickthrower2 on Friday February 24, 2023 @02:24AM
(#34921894)
Funding things you wont be fired for funding. IBMs!
I’ve seen a lot of grants end with “we learned something”. Is that a dead end? IDK.
Re:AI‘s Instagram Problem
by kanyethegreat on Thursday February 23, 2023 @11:23PM
(#34920732)
“Run in the other direction” is so generic that it isn’t helpful. No one else going in that direction is, at best, unrelated to the quality of the idea and, at worst, a heuristic that the idea is bad.
It's not the other direction, it's an other direction. The distinction is important.
If there are only two directions and everybody runs in one of them, there's probably a good reason. If there are virtually infinite directions, trusting your gut about an unexplored direction that you find interesting is a much better bet. See also: startup advice.
I myself know I'm very slow, specially developing projects. So I don't try to race anyone, except contribute to things I know are neglected. There are so many neglected problems, you don't need to work on the most coveted fields.