Re:Feds, Please Return My Personal Files Stored at MegaUpload
by Zirro on Friday January 20, 2012 @08:59AM
(#3489457)
They don't have the shady history that Megaupload did, and appear to actually comply with DMCA-requests. That will hopefully keep them safe for a while. If it doesn't, hosting files for "everyone" is a doomed business.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Feds, Please Return My Personal Files Stored at MegaUpload
by cdr on Friday January 20, 2012 @09:57AM
(#3489629)
Megaupload complied extremely quickly with DCMA requests by all reports. The non-compliance cited in the indictment appears to be somewhat of a technicality - at worst, only removing links instead of the file. Are you sure Mediafire complies more zealously than Megaupload did?
Re:Feds, Please Return My Personal Files Stored at MegaUpload
by kevinh on Friday January 20, 2012 @01:54PM
(#3490671)
I don't understand why you view removing the links and not the content as a technicality and not the crux of the issue. If you're ordered to remove content from your servers and do not do so, it's unsurprising that you aren't really complying with the DMCA.
Removing links isn't the same as removing content.
Re:Feds, Please Return My Personal Files Stored at MegaUpload
by dangrossman on Friday January 20, 2012 @04:40PM
(#3491340)
Re-reading the DMCA yesterday was the first time I realized that it actually does require a service like Dropbox to remove every user's copy of a file upon receiving a notice of infringement even if only one of those copies is not allowed and the rest are entirely legal.
Re:Feds, Please Return My Personal Files Stored at MegaUpload
by matale on Friday January 20, 2012 @10:19AM
(#3489711)
Mediafire also don't give incentives for people to put popular files on their system as far as I can tell.
With most services like MegaUpload/Rapidshare you get paid when people download your files, hence their popularity, its a business for a lot of uploaders.