Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial
by yason on Friday January 20, 2012 @03:13AM
(#3488777)
I sometimes wonder that BitKeeper had allowed kernel developers to use it freely, none of git would have happened. Conversely, does anyone know what's going on with BitKeeper these days? Assumedly they can sell their commercial product to some markets but practically I haven't heard of BK once since git was announced. Potentially a big blunder on their part.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.