Re:Software 2.0
by theptip on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @12:50PM
(#34884245)
On the flip side, if the rest of the process becomes easy and in some sense standardized (the art/craft of code is replaced with back-prop), then maybe the complements like data cleaning, model bias/error measuring, and interpretability become “the work” that the high-paid scientists/engineers focus on?
I can particularly imagine a regulatory environment much more rigorous than software has got away with thus far, for example strict requirements around certifying that your model doesn’t exhibit X Y Z biases according to standard frameworks of evaluation.
Re:Software 2.0
by hinkley on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @01:46PM
(#34885054)
Not if the ladder gets pulled up behind us. If there's nowhere to train people with 0 years of experience to do this work effectively, then new developer creation will drop by 10x which means five years in we'll be missing 40% of the workforce.
I can particularly imagine a regulatory environment much more rigorous than software has got away with thus far, for example strict requirements around certifying that your model doesn’t exhibit X Y Z biases according to standard frameworks of evaluation.