News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Databricks counts being laid off as “red flag” by password11 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @12:54AM (#34877235)
What I find strange in OP's story is that HC and recruiter actually gave a reason for the rejection. Most companies after they reject you are tight-lipped.

> denied by multiple Databricks employees in the [Blind] thread, who clearly said...

That proves nothing. HR departments shill on Blind.

Re:Databricks counts being laid off as “red flag” by dclowd9901 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @01:27AM (#34877454)
Yes, same here. The banality of job rejection is quite far from many of the anecdotes I read about it.
Re:Databricks counts being laid off as “red flag” by ageek123 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @02:48AM (#34878065)
I agree “HR departments shill on Blind” but the claim made by several people in that thread (at least one who said they are a hiring manager) that Databricks has recently hired multiple people who were laid off is verifiable as true or false. It’s not just a generic weasel statement like “it’s not our policy to…” or “we treat all applicants fairly” or something like that.
Re:Databricks counts being laid off as “red flag” by password11 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @03:36AM (#34878399)
> but the claim made by several people in that thread (at least one who said they are a hiring manager) that Databricks has recently hired multiple people who were laid off is verifiable as true or false

How exactly, again, did you verify their identity as a hiring manager?