News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Philosophy of Computer Science by shawn-butler on Monday February 20, 2023 @07:26PM (#34874814)
Computer architecture used to be and imho was properly a part of electrical engineering.

“Computer science” was never really scientific. Algorithms, symbolic logic, natural languages, computational complexity, finite model theory and compilers, after that it’s what, grinding gears?

Can you name one significant experimental result in computer science? Nothing comes to my mind.

Re:The Philosophy of Computer Science by l33t233372 on Monday February 20, 2023 @07:39PM (#34874915)
The fields of human-computer interaction, and UI/UX design have experiments.

Testing various compiler optimizations for practicality, etc. are also commonly done.

Re:The Philosophy of Computer Science by PeterisP on Monday February 20, 2023 @08:48PM (#34875463)
You list natural language, and natural language processing is a highly experimental / empirical field.
Re:The Philosophy of Computer Science by l33t233372 on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @09:23AM (#34881486)
I saw this paper’s abstract and was reminded of your comment: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10559

> Experimentally, we comprehensively compare the behavior of ICL and explicit finetuning based on real tasks to provide empirical evidence that supports our understanding

Re:The Philosophy of Computer Science by mxkopy on Tuesday February 21, 2023 @04:42AM (#34878949)
Lambda calculus was an experiment, I'd say. Wolfram's rule 30 too, though granted it's not that significant.

You have to do a bit of science whenever something unexpected comes around and you have to fit it into what you know.