News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial. Parent comment

Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial by gcp on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:19PM (#3487410)
I wouldn't mind some of the big users of git summarizing the "best practices" they arrived at in a nice presentation.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial by SethRobertson on Friday January 20, 2012 @04:23PM (#3491273)
Here is a document describing git best practices which has been liked by some of the most knowledgeable git users out there.

Commit Often, Perfect Later, Publish Once: Git Best Practices https://gist.github.com/1540906

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial by dmoney on Thursday January 19, 2012 @10:22PM (#3488164)
For large projects, there is git-flow: https://www.google.com/search?q=git-flow

I remember someone posting a recommended workflow for smaller projects, but I don't remember what it was called.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial by lysium on Friday January 20, 2012 @05:55AM (#3489072)
github uses a different flow. This article mentions the issues with git-flow and describes the flow used at github:

http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html

[ Parent | on HN ]