News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by redthrowaway on Thursday January 19, 2012 @06:17PM (#3487405)
I'm highly doubtful that that's all that's happening. I simply can't see a 5600-strong botnet (voluntary or not) holding down 4 independent domains simultaneously.

On a separate note, I would have thought they had learned their lesson re: LOIC after OP:Payback. I guess we'll be seeing another string of arrests in the coming months.

Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by codezero on Thursday January 19, 2012 @07:41PM (#3487713)
They might manage to fill the connection limit for apache on each system (I think this is default to 256?).
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by oinksoft on Thursday January 19, 2012 @09:49PM (#3488063)
It's not very likely that those sites are using Apache on the front lines.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by bmelton on Thursday January 19, 2012 @10:45PM (#3488215)
They are.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by cpeterso on Friday January 20, 2012 @12:50AM (#3488532)
mpaa.org is using nginx/1.0.5, but the other sites do indeed seem to be Apache servers.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by baby on Friday January 20, 2012 @04:16AM (#3488877)
This! Apache is the first casualty when attacked by DOS. Default is way lower than 256 I think... You can change that parameter but it kills the optimization.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by Zirro on Thursday January 19, 2012 @08:17PM (#3487805)
Can't LOIC be operated through a VPN? (Assuming the VPN-operators allow it)
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by redthrowaway on Thursday January 19, 2012 @08:53PM (#3487917)
If you routed all your traffic through the VPN, LOIC would follow. That said, I know of no vpn that would allow it.

Basically, LOIC is a ticket to jail. The fact that it was used for so long without repercussions is that the Feds didn't care enough to do anything. That all changed with OP:Payback.

Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by goblin89 on Friday January 20, 2012 @03:34AM (#3488807)
But how could an open source network stress testing utility become a ticket to jail?
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by sp332 on Friday January 20, 2012 @07:25AM (#3489240)
Intentionally disabling someone else's computer system (even just their website) is a crime. And LOIC has no anonymity measures, so your IP shows up on every single packet that arrives at the target computer. If you participate in an attack, it will be very easy to find and prosecute you.
Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by Peaker on Friday January 20, 2012 @10:16AM (#3489700)
Richard Stallman used an analogy of voluntary DDoS with street protests.

Street protests make whole streets inaccessible, and may disable access to stores, businesses or what not.

Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by tete on Saturday January 21, 2012 @06:05AM (#3493304)
In Europe this analogy has also been used by politicians (ones that are actually sitting in parliaments and not accused of crimes).

I'd also consider it a form of peaceful protest. Well, actually it's just data, nobody gets physically harmed so it's always peaceful. Anyways, you are not stealing data and you are not permanently harming the system. You basically do something the site is made for (serving requests). If you consider that a crime you could also consider telling a huge people to phone a company and complain about something a crime. I mean this certainly leads to a denial of service, because it makes it virtually impossible for others to use that service.

I for myself am a bit lazy for these kinds of protests. I actually prefer informing people so they draw their own conclusion, but I would never call something like that a crime. IMO it should be treated like a freedom. I know this can cause financial damage, but it's still not harming people. I mean every news article, every kind of information and just saying something like "Nike is child slavery" or "fast food from McDonalds is unhealthy" can make people not buy stuff there and therefore cause financial damage. In first place it's about an institution and we shouldn't consider an institution something that has human rights, because it devalues natural people.

Re:Anonymous takes down Department of Justice and Universal ... by TheCapn on Friday January 20, 2012 @10:50AM (#3489846)
The way I look at it is like having 100 of your friends all go to McDonalds and line up. One at a time you order a glass of water, and then go to the back of the line. Honest customers will enter and get in line. If they wait/keep trying for long enough they'll be able to fulfill a request but most will get fed up and quit trying.