Re:The Real Difference Between Git and Mercurial
by bostonvaulter2 on Thursday January 19, 2012 @08:28PM
(#3487842)
But if a project is using git, you don't have much choice but to use git as well (of course there are some bridges, but I don't think they work 100%)
That's not entirely true, in the sense that popular editors tend to have more extensions, syntax highlighting for more languages, auto-completion, etc... That helps draw in more users.
I just don't see where people would be having the same experience with Mercurial.
Well, there's bitbucket. IIRC some programming language communities have standardized on even more off-mainstream VCS.
But yeah, on the whole Git got an advantage in users somewhere along the way, and that's now self-reinforcing. It helps that there's no competition that's obviously better.