Re:How not to do URL redirects (… the way Quora does)
by marquis on Thursday January 19, 2012 @07:46PM
(#3487726)
I think that is does benefit Quora for content providers to see how much traffic is being generated from their site. If I knew an article was getting a lot of traction on a site I would spend more time on there, perhaps participate and continue to improve and generate content itself, thus benefiting Quora with more data and more links for everyone.
Re:How not to do URL redirects (… the way Quora does)
by avlesh-singh on Thursday January 19, 2012 @05:09PM
(#3487052)
Of course there is zero incentive for anyone to do it. And if everyone chose to link the way Quora does, you get a Google Analytics dashboard which cannot tell you what all URL's are sending traffic to your site/blog. I find it really difficult to imagine.
Re:How not to do URL redirects (… the way Quora does)
by mcgwiz on Friday January 20, 2012 @03:49PM
(#3491160)
The long term effect would be that websites can no longer use referrer as a metric. What difference would that make? HTTP resources (webpages) shouldn't change semantic meaning depending on the referrer anyway. Doing so is arguably an unintended use (or abuse) of HTTP.
Re:How not to do URL redirects (… the way Quora does)
by avlesh-singh on Saturday January 21, 2012 @01:15AM
(#3492785)
Absolutely! And see the funny reasons people have been citing in favor of such an act - http://www.quora.com/Why-does-Quora-redirect-to-URLs-in-a-wa...
Right now they protect their users' privacy. What benefit do they realize by providing their users' viewing history to other sites?
I personally think that the referer header was never a good idea. I disable it in my browser, and appreciate sites that do right by their users with privacy protecting default behaviors.