Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by pessimizer on Sunday February 19, 2023 @03:33PM
(#34861561)
It adds nothing to reply to someone saying that the changes at twitter could be good and influential by saying "but they could also be bad." It's already implied in the could.
> I’d rather judge on things that have actually happened than have to deal with a new set of forward looking projections about what could happen every few months.
If you're leaving all prediction and forecasting to other people, why complain when they do it?
Re:Meta’s testing $12 per month paid verification on Instagr...
by kristianc on Sunday February 19, 2023 @03:55PM
(#34861771)
I'm not pointing out that they could be bad — I'm pointing out that there's a good track record of them not happening at all, particularly when it comes to Musk.
> I’d rather judge on things that have actually happened than have to deal with a new set of forward looking projections about what could happen every few months.
If you're leaving all prediction and forecasting to other people, why complain when they do it?