Re:Don't OFFICIAL ballons have to have transponders?
by mrsofty on Sunday February 19, 2023 @11:25AM
(#34858932)
Hmm,
so this was a big balloon and I assume that we could calculate it's approximate weight. Thus determine if it SHOULD or SHOULD NOT have a transponder and enable a course of action based on that.
as to the $400,000 missile I mention that because it seems to be the WORST approach ( if it was a sidewinder) in this situation. It's a fragmentation package and probably would scrap ANY intel platform PHYSICALLY as I would assume the Chinese bricked the electronics the moment the fighter got close.
Thanks for the reply
Re:Don't OFFICIAL ballons have to have transponders?
by bitxbitxbitcoin on Sunday February 19, 2023 @02:04PM
(#34860675)
What’s official in the US may not be so in China.
Plus a transponder, battery pack (that works at those temperatures), and sensors, would likely cost in the excess of $1500~ and weigh more than the hobby balloon as a whole by a lot. A radar reflector isn't really required with a balloon because the entire side of the balloon itself is a radar reflector.
As to why the US used a $400K missile to shoot down a balloon? I'd argue they used a $400K missile to avert political criticism, since the media decided to turn it into a thing.
The reality is that signal intelligence can be gathered on the ground and sent back to China trivially. The US isn't a police state after all, gathering signal intelligence is passive, and shipping it back to China isn't a particularly hard problem. We already know that almost all embassies (including "friendly" ones) do so, and it is likely China has some satellite capability in that area too.