News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Go is 17 times more sustainable than Python by 6gvONxR4sf7o on Saturday February 18, 2023 @02:08PM (#34849982)
This is misleading work because they chose such an unrepresentative toy model.

They essentially say that in python most of the time is spent doing python work, while in go, most of the time is spent in the math calculations. That’s only true because so little calculation happens in this toy model. Scale it up to a realistic model, and python vs go should become a rounding error.

I also take issue with the conflation of sustainability and speed.

Re:Go is 17 times more sustainable than Python by rg111 on Saturday February 18, 2023 @02:18PM (#34850096)
And they used Numpy.

They should have used pytorch or tensorflow if they knew what they were doing.

Nobody uses Numpy for Deep Learning.