Females more likely than males to be elected in US scientific societies

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by dennis_jeeves1 on Saturday February 18, 2023 @01:45PM (#34849736)

> But as a society we simply ignore the gendered nature of these atrocities. For some reason we can shrug off another human being's suffering when it's a son or a brother, far more easily than when it's a sister or daughter.

The roots are biological, men are the dispensable gender, given that a single man can potentially impregnate several women. On the other hand if a female is lost, her potential progeny is also lost. I'm not alluding to the fact that it is justified just because it's biological. What is also biological is that a large number of very responsible men have lone wolf tendencies, where they despair in loneliness due to the responsibilities, and burden of expectations placed on them.

A some what workable solution ( though again the innate biology can hinder) would be for men to from support groups for each other. Most governments, family, society, and women are not going to do that for men in trouble. Let that cold fact sink in.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by safety1st on Saturday February 18, 2023 @02:08PM (#34849983)

The roots may be biological, but we rise above our biology every day. That is the essence of the liberal project - we protect the weak instead of leave them behind. Democracy, a system of justice, these things are unnatural. They exist to prevent us from degenerating into a Hobbesian state of nature where might makes right.

The inability of our society to protect victims and the weak when they happen to be male is one of the strongest signs that the left wing is no longer actually liberal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by dennis_jeeves1 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @09:15AM (#34857722)

Good luck with you idealism, given that over 95% of 'society' does not care either for themselves or others, let alone the weak.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by safety1st on Monday February 20, 2023 @12:05AM (#34865102)

I have plenty of cynical opinions about the state of society, but here's the rub: if you believe you're going to lose, your belief will come true 100% of the time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by throway33 on Saturday February 18, 2023 @05:44PM (#34851872)

In my experience, it's women who have lost sons or husbands to suicide or gang violence who are among the most likely to offer and advocate for support for at-risk men.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Females more likely than males to be elected in US scient... by dennis_jeeves1 on Sunday February 19, 2023 @09:12AM (#34857699)

Sons, I understand based on my observation. The husband thing is a new data point for me.

[ Parent | on HN ]