News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A C64 MP3 Player by matja on Saturday February 18, 2023 @09:20AM (#34847116)
From memory a 486DX4-100 or an overclocked 486DX2-66 (to 80MHz) could just about handle 128kbit MP3s
Re:A C64 MP3 Player by A-Train on Saturday February 18, 2023 @09:52AM (#34847303)
Ah nostalgia... This was my first PC processor. I remember my CPU came with some sort of a bug that prevented me running windows 3.11 on it.
Re:A C64 MP3 Player by bane on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:31AM (#34847600)
Yeah, I seem to remember there was that brief time period where my PC could barely play MP3s and I used to treat them like zip archives -- rendering them back out to WAV files to play them back.

I think you're right and that was around the 486 DX2, DX4, Pentium transitional time period.

Re:A C64 MP3 Player by SillyUsername on Saturday February 18, 2023 @11:53AM (#34848389)
Interesting. My Amiga with a 68030 @42Mhz could just about pull off mono 128Kbps decoding (as long as you didn't multitask too much). That would suggest the 486 was almost clock comparable to a 68030 at least for lossy decompression, perhaps the 486 was around ~110% had their been a 68030 series 80Mhz equivalent.
Re:A C64 MP3 Player by bouncycastle on Saturday February 18, 2023 @10:10PM (#34853879)
I wonder if that was also an I/O limitation rather than just a CPU thing. Old floppies probably would not handle 128kbit. Hard drives were slow too, so was memory and bus.
Re:A C64 MP3 Player by vlasky on Sunday February 19, 2023 @06:10AM (#34856542)
I remember I could play 128kbit MP3s in full quality using mpg123 running under Windows for Workgroups 3.11 ONLY when I overclocked my 486DX4-100 to 120Mhz.