News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by duringmath on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:39PM (#34823475)
These bots generate responses one word at a time based on a statistical model, any talk of AGI, existential risks or machine consciousness is divorced from reality
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by srinivgp on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:45PM (#34823579)
In a very real sense, so do you.
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by spookie on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:57PM (#34823826)
Let's be honest, we know very little about our brains. I'm sure part of it is just that, but I've made way too many "rational" stupid decisions to think that's about it.

Most of us, exact sciences pilgrims (speaking as if my degree makes me worthy of being included in such a group of individuals), should try to go outside more. No offense, but our biases are too great.

Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by duringmath on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:58PM (#34823831)
Yeah but sometimes (not too often mind you) I know what I'm talking about
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by PartiallyTyped on Thursday February 16, 2023 @03:36PM (#34825625)
What is knowing if not an influence on state transition probabilities?
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by truy766579 on Thursday February 16, 2023 @11:30PM (#34830797)
Question like this are giving nightmares to AI researchers right now I guess.
Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by spookie on Thursday February 16, 2023 @01:49PM (#34823668)
True.

We should stop repeating the marketing speech. It's getting tiresome.

Re:How should AI systems behave, and who should decide? by truy766579 on Thursday February 16, 2023 @11:28PM (#34830781)
Strong intelligence does not requires self-consciousness. But probably, most strong intelligent agents won't be discernible from actual AGI. Maybe somewhere in the future, with enough grounded intelligent agents, we'll just give up and say, yeah, these guys are actual AGIs.

Right now the existential risk is fully in hands of humans, unless someone decides to free one poorly trained agent into the open Internet, then you'd have more problems. Stuxnet level stuff.

Did you saw that thing Whisper? What if someone trains something like that, but fine tuned for automatic-hacking? and automatic retrieval of new exploits, and automatic re-shuffle of code to hide from security software, and pum, the thing is flying solo into the wide Internet, just f*cking aways stuff and hiding from silly humans. No conciousness, not chatGPT-like level of intelligence, but 10x the danger level of older non-intelligent worms.