Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first”

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by bmacho on Thursday February 16, 2023 @08:42AM (#34818439)

> It's pants-on-head silly to think "ChatGPT 2.0" is anything other than, at best, a magpie. If you put the nuclear codes under a shiny object, or arranged it such that saying a random basic word would trigger a launch, then yeah a magpie could fire off nukes.

> But why the hell would you do that?!?!

Exactly. Except that they are doing it exactly, and we are the ones asking 'why the hell would you do that?!'.

A chatGPT 2.0 knows everything, really. If you command it (or it reaches the conclusion itself for some unrelated commands), it can hack nuclear arsenals and nuke everything, or worse.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Bing: “I will not harm you unless you harm me first” by JohnFen on Thursday February 16, 2023 @05:37PM (#34827527)

> A chatGPT 2.0 knows everything, really. If you command it (or it reaches the conclusion itself for some unrelated commands), it can hack nuclear arsenals and nuke everything, or worse.

Pretty much everything here is incorrect. An LLM is not omniscient. An LLM does not think or reason. An LLM does not reach conclusions.

There is no "AI" here in the sense you're saying.

[ Parent | on HN ]