Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectual society

Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua... by mafribe on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @06:14PM (#34812335)

> maximizing the number of voices at the table

The easiest way of doing so is to maximise the number of humans on the planet. Those who engage, and promote reproduction organ destruction whether surgical or chemical, do the exact opposite and decrease the number of voices -- in the long run to zero.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua... by breadbreadbread on Wednesday February 15, 2023 @10:26PM (#34814612)

this is the most disingenuous response i've ever seen

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Speech is violence? Not if we want a liberal, intellectua... by mafribe on Thursday February 16, 2023 @09:51AM (#34819348)

> most disingenuous response i've ever seen

Promoters of sex-deception and concomitant fertility destruction, typically seem to communicate in a way that is (1) a refusal to address substantial points, (2) adversarial hyperbole, and (3) refusal to engage in any kind rational argument that could lead to mutually beneficial truth-seeking and learning.

I'm sure that you agree that the quoted sentence above confirms those patterns? Can I invite you to reflect on why we see this pattern?

[ Parent | on HN ]